Methodological Evaluation of Advantages of Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Sjögren's Syndrome / 中国实验方剂学杂志

Screening and evaluating the diseases responding specifically to traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） will help to highlight the advantages of TCM treatment， and the evaluation method should be standardized with consideration to the unique characteristics of the diseases. The incidence of Sjögren's Syndrome （SS） is increasing year by year， while the pathogenesis of this disease remains unclear. Modern therapies for this disease include biological agents and immunosuppressants， which generally have unsatisfactory efficacy. The TCM treatment of SS focuses on the harmony of the physical and mental health. The Rheumatology Branch of the China Association of Chinese Medicine organizes experts in TCM， Western medicine， and evidence-based medicine to form working groups. Delphi method and bibliometric method were used for analysis， and SS was selected as a disease responding specifically to TCM. Furthermore， the evaluation system was established for this disease， and the consensus regarding this disease was reached after seminar discussion. This paper summarized the whole process of the evaluation of the advantages of TCM treatment of SS. First， because TCM atomization is widely used in clinical practice and enriches TCM administration methods， this therapy is included after other non-drug therapies were taken as characteristic therapies. Second， the evaluation indicators of therapeutic effect should be determined with consideration to international acceptance and the current research status. Third， the expression method should be accurate， standardized， and objective， highlight the natural advantages of TCM， and avoid arbitrary extension. This paper provides a reference for clinicians to explore other diseases responding specifically to TCM.

Principales aspectos de la producción científica y editorial de MEDISAN en el quinquenio 2017-2021 / Main aspects of MEDISAN's scientific and editorial production in the five- year period 2017-2021 i:en

Introducción: En el mundo académico, la publicación científica se ha convertido en un problema constante, tanto en sus elementos cuantitativos como en los cualitativos. Objetivo: Caracterizar el nivel de publicación de MEDISAN según algunos aspectos de su producción científica y editorial. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación observacional, descriptiva y transversal, del tipo bibliométrico, de la producción científica en la revista MEDISAN de Santiago de Cuba durante el quinquenio 2017-2021. La población de estudio quedó conformada por todos los artículos científicos publicados en ese periodo según los registros de las bases de datos SciELO Citation Index y Google Académico, así como los de la propia revista en la plataforma Open Journal Systems. Resultados: Durante el periodo analizado se publicaron 38 números, que incluyeron 679 artículos y 2367 autores. Se destacaron el año 2017 con mayor cantidad de publicaciones (31,8 %) y el año 2019 con una menor cifra (14,3 %). Los autores cubanos presentaron una contribución superior (629 artículos), sobre todo los de la provincia de Santiago de Cuba, donde sobresalieron los profesionales de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas, con 50,1 % de toda la producción. El índice h5 reveló una tendencia al aumento de las citas que recibió la revista, dado que en el año 2021 su resultado fue 23 y en el 2022 se incrementó a 27. Conclusiones: El análisis de la producción científica y editorial reveló las fortalezas y debilidades de la revista, lo que permite trazar políticas para aumentar su calidad y, con ello, su visibilidad en bases de datos.

Introduction: In the academic world, scientific publication has become a constant problem, both in its quantitative and qualitative elements. Objective: To characterize MEDISAN's publication rate according to some aspects of its scientific and editorial production. Methods: An observational, descriptive and transversal research, of bibliometric type, was carried out on the scientific production of MEDISAN journal from Santiago de Cuba during the five-year period 2017-2021. The study population was made up of all scientific articles published in that period according to the records of SciELO Citation Index and Google Scholar databases, as well as those of the journal itself on the Open Journal Systems. Results: During the analyzed period, 38 issues were published, which included 679 articles and 2,367 authors. The year 2017 stood out with the highest number of publications (31.8%) and the year 2019 with a lower number (14.3%). Cuban authors had the greatest contribution (629 articles), especially those from Santiago de Cuba province, where professionals from University of Medical Sciences stood out, with 50.1% of all production. The h5 index revealed a trend of increasing citations received by the journal, since in 2021 it was 23 and in 2022 it increased to 27. Conclusions: The analysis of scientific and editorial production revealed the strengths and weaknesses of the journal, which makes it possible to draw up policies to increase its quality and, with it, its visibility in databases.

Análise textual de temáticas presentes em artigos sobre Saúde Coletiva publicados em um periódico da área de Fonoaudiologia / Textual analysis of topics addressed in articles on Collective Health published in a speech-language-hearing journal / Análisis textual de temas presentes en artículos sobre Salud Colectiva publicados en revista del área de Logopedia

Introdução: Políticas públicas implementadas para a consolidação do SUS forneceram condições concretas para a ampliação e ressignificação da atuação dos profissionais de saúde. Objetivo: Este estudo analisa as principais temáticas abordadas em pesquisas relacionadas à atuação da Fonoaudiologia no campo da Saúde Coletiva, a partir das publicações de um periódico da área, no período de cinco anos. Método: Trata-se de um estudo com abordagem qualitativa, de caráter descritivo e interpretativo, cujos dados foram coletados e organizados pela classificação hierárquica descendente do software IRaMuTeQ®, submetidos à análise lexical e discutidos à luz de políticas e estudos relacionados à área da Saúde Coletiva. Resultados: Inicialmente, foram registrados 50 artigos (entre 2016-2020), que totalizaram 314 segmentos de texto, com 1.1232 ocorrências, classificadas em quatro classes denominadas: Descrição de variáveis presentes nos estudos transversais/epidemiológicos (41,3%); Cenários de práticas fonoaudiológicas e políticas públicas voltadas à promoção da saúde e prevenção de agravos (28,2%); Novas demandas e contextos de atuação fonoaudiológica: estrutura e organização de serviços do SUS (17,0%); e Desafios da formação do fonoaudiólogo (13,5). Conclusão: a utilização do software para o processamento de dados qualitativos sobre pesquisa na área da Fonoaudiologia no campo da Saúde Coletiva propiciou a identificação de classes(,) que apontaram características da população estudada(,) e cenários de práticas deste campo, com destaque a ações voltadas à promoção da saúde e à prevenção de agravos à saúde, e ressaltou a importância de reflexões sobre a formação do fonoaudiólogo para a atenção integral à saúde e enfrentamento de problemas contemporâneos como a violência. (AU)

Introduction: Public policies implemented for the consolidation of the SUS provided concrete conditions for expanding and redefining the role of health professionals. Objective: This study analyzes the main themes addressed in research related to the performance of Speech Therapy in the field of Collective Health, based on publications in a journal in the area, over a period of five years. Method: This is a study with a qualitative approach, with a descriptive and interpretative character, whose data were collected and organized by the descending hierarchical classification of the IRaMuTeQ® software, submitted to lexical analysis and discussed in the light of policies and studies related to Collective Health. Results: Initially, 50 articles were registered (between 2016-2020), which totaled 314 text segments, with 1,1232 occurrences, classified into four classes called: Description of variables present in cross-sectional/epidemiological studies (41.3%); Scenarios of speech therapy practices and public policies aimed at health promotion and disease prevention (28.2%); New demands and contexts for speech therapy: structure and organization of SUS services (17.0%); and Challenges of speech therapist training (13.5). Conclusion: the use of software for processing qualitative data on research in the area of Speech Therapy in the field of Collective Health led to the identification of classes, which pointed out characteristics of the population studied, scenarios of practices in this field, with emphasis on actions aimed at promoting health and the prevention of health problems and emphasized the importance of reflections on the training of speech therapists for comprehensive health care and coping with contemporary problems such as violence. (AU)

Introducción: Las políticas públicas implementadas para la consolidación del SUS proporcionaron condiciones concretas para ampliar y redefinir el papel de los profesionales de la salud. Objetivo: Este estudio analiza los principales temas abordados en investigaciones relacionadas con la actuación de la Logopedia en el campo de la Salud Colectiva, a partir de publicaciones en un periódico del área, en un período de cinco años. Método: Se trata de un estudio con abordaje cualitativo, de carácter descriptivo e interpretativo, cuyos datos fueron recolectados y organizados por la clasificación jerárquica descendente del software IRaMuTeQ®, sometidos a análisis léxico y discutidos a la luz de políticas y estudios relacionados con el Colectivo del Área de la Salud. Resultados: Inicialmente se registraron 50 artículos (entre 2016-2020), que totalizaron 314 segmentos de texto, con 1.232 ocurrencias, clasificados en cuatro clases denominadas: Descripción de variables presentes en estudios transversales/epidemiológicos (41,3%); Escenarios de prácticas logopédicas y políticas públicas dirigidas a la promoción de la salud y prevención de enfermedades (28,2%); Nuevas demandas y contextos para la logopedia: estructura y organización de los servicios del SUS (17,0%); y Desafíos de la formación de logopedas (13.5). Conclusión: el uso de software para el procesamiento de datos cualitativos sobre investigaciones en el área de Logopedia en el campo de la Salud Colectiva permitió la identificación de clases, que señalaron características de la población estudiada, escenarios de prácticas en este campo, con énfasis en las acciones dirigidas a la promoción de la salud y la prevención de los problemas de salud y destacó la importancia de las reflexiones sobre la formación de logopedas para la atención integral de la salud y el enfrentamiento de problemas contemporáneos como la violencia. (AU)

Las publicaciones científicas de los profesionales de la Clínica Universitaria de Especialidades Estomatológicas "Manuel Cedeño" / Scientific publications by professionals of the "Manuel Cedeño" University Clinic of Dental Specialties

Fundamento: Las publicaciones científicas son importantes en el ámbito médico pues permiten la divulgación de las investigaciones científicas. Objetivo: Describir el comportamiento de las publicaciones científicas de los profesionales pertenecientes a la Clínica Universitaria de Especialidades Estomatológicas "Manuel Cedeño". Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo, de tipo bibliométrico en la Clínica de Especialidades Estomatológicas "Manuel Cedeño", desde noviembre de 2016 hasta junio de 2021. Los indicadores bibliométricos estudiados fueron: cantidad de artículos publicados por año, revista de publicación, tipología de los artículos y temática investigada. Resultados: Se encontraron 29 artículos publicados, de ellos el 86.20 % fueron reportes originales. El año 2019 fue el de más publicaciones científicas. En la revista Multimed se publicó la mayor cantidad y la temática más abordada fue Ortodoncia con el 31.03 %. Conclusiones: Los informes originales predominaron, se publicaron trabajos en revistas cubanas y se abordaron varios temas; aun así, consideramos que la cantidad de artículos debe ser mayor y más diversa según tipología.

Background: Scientific publications are important in the medical field because they permit the divulgation of scientific research. Objective: To describe the behavior of scientific publications of the professionals belonging to the "Manuel Cedeño" University Clinic of Dental Specialties. Methodology: A descriptive and retrospective bibliometric study was conducted at the "Manuel Cedeño" University Clinic of Dental Specialties, from November 2016 to June 2021. The bibliometric indicators studied were: number of articles published by year, publication journal, article typology and subject researched. Results: A number of 29 published articles were found, out of which 86.20% were original reports. 2019 was the year with the highest number of scientific publications. The greatest number was published in the Multimed journal, and the subject most covered was Orthodontics, with 31.03%. Conclusions: The original reports predominated, articles were published in Cuban journals and various topics were covered; even so, we consider that the number of articles must be greater and more diverse according to typology.

Ciclos de vida: análise das publicações na revista Distúrbios da Comunicação no período de 2016 a 2020 / Life cycles: analysis of publications in Communication Disorders Journal from 2016 to 2020 / Ciclos de vida: análisis de las publicaciones en la revista Disturbios de la Comunicación de 2016 a 2020

Introdução: ciclo de vida é atualmente considerado elemento essencial à formulação e implantação de políticas públicas pautadas no cuidado integral à saúde. Objetivo: analisar a produção científica da Revista Distúrbios da Comunicação no período de 2016 a 2020, tendo como objeto de discussão as publicações da área da Fonoaudiologia por ciclos de vida. Método: estudo retrospectivo, de abordagem metodológica bibliométrica, analisou 297 artigos considerando as seguintes variáveis: ano de publicação, registro da região geográfica (do primeiro autor), descritores, áreas temáticas, tipo de estudo e tamanho da amostra, segundo faixas etárias (0-6; 7-11; 12-18;19-59 e >60). A análise dos dados foi descritiva, numérica e percentual. Resultados: dos 297, estudos, 258 fizeram referência a uma ou mais faixas etárias e 39 não mencionaram qualquer idade. Dentre os 258, os estudos mais frequentes foram de criança (138; 46,2%), seguido pelos de adultos (122; 41,1%). A amostra variou quanto à mediana entre 27 (adulto) a 38 (crianças: 0-6 anos) sujeitos. A região Sudeste registrou maior número de artigos relacionados a todos os ciclos, assim como os estudos do tipo observacional, com destaque para os realizados com adultos (98; 33,9%). Pouca menção foi feita a descritores que identificam os ciclos de vida (75; 6%), sendo idoso (25; 38%) e criança (23; 35%) os mais registrados. Conclusão: os dados evidenciam a premência de alinhamento das pesquisas às políticas públicas de saúde, bem como ressalta a importância do uso de descritores adequados para maior circulação do conhecimento produzido pela área. (AU)

Introduction: life cycle is currently considered an essential element for the formulation and implementation of public policies based on comprehensive health care. Objective: to analyze the scientific production of Communication Disorders Journal from 2016 to 2020, having as an object of discussion publications in the field of Speech Therapy by life cycles. Method: a retrospective study, with a bibliometric methodological approach, analyzed 297 articles considering the following variables: year of publication, registration of the geographic region (of the first author), descriptors, thematic areas, type of study and sample size, according to age groups (0 -6; 7-11; 12-18; 19-59 and >60). Data analysis was descriptive, numerical and percentage. Results: of the 297 studies, 258 referred to one or more age groups and 39 did not mention any age. Among the 258, the most frequent studies were children (138; 46.2%), followed by adults (122; 41.1%). The sample ranged in terms of median from 27 (adult) to 38 (children: 0-6 years) subjects. The Southeast region recorded the highest number of articles related to all cycles, as well as observational studies, especially those carried out with adults (98; 33.9%). Little mention was made of descriptors that identify life cycles (75; 6%), being elderly (25; 38%) and children (23; 35%) the most registered. Conclusion: the data show the urgency of aligning research with public health policies, as well as highlighting the importance of using appropriate descriptors for greater circulation of knowledge produced by the area. (AU)

Introducción: el ciclo de vida es considerado en la actualidad un elemento esencial para la formulación e implementación de políticas públicas basadas en la atención integral de la salud. Objetivo: analizar la producción científica de la Disturbios de la Comunicación de 2016 a 2020, teniendo como objeto de discusión publicaciones en el campo de la Logopedia por ciclos de vida. Método: estudio retrospectivo, con enfoque metodológico bibliométrico, se analizaron 297 artículos considerando las siguientes variables: año de publicación, registro de la región geográfica (del primer autor), descriptores, áreas temáticas, tipo de estudio y tamaño de la muestra, según grupos de edad (0-6; 7-11; 12-18; 19-59 y >60). El análisis de los datos fue descriptivo, numérico y porcentual. Resultados: de los 297 estudios, 258 se refirieron a uno o más grupos de edad y 39 no mencionaron ninguna edad. Entre los 258, los estudios más frecuentes fueron los niños (138; 46,2%), seguidos de los adultos (122; 41,1%). La muestra osciló en términos de mediana de 27 (adultos) a 38 (niños: 0-6 años) sujetos. La región Sudeste registró el mayor número de artículos relacionados con todos los ciclos, además de estudios observacionales, en especial los realizados con adultos (98; 33,9%). Se hizo poca mención de descriptores que identifican ciclos de vida (75; 6%), siendo ancianos (25; 38%) y niños (23; 35%) los más registrados. Conclusión: los datos muestran la urgencia de alinear la investigación con las políticas públicas de salud, además de resaltar la importancia de utilizar descriptores apropiados para una mayor circulación del conocimiento producido por el área. (AU)

Bibliometric Analysis of the Worldwide Scientific Production on COVID?19 Infection and Cerebrovascular Disease

Objective: To identify the worldwide bibliometric characteristics of research on SARS?CoV?2 infection and cerebrovascular disease. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, and bibliometric study was performed. We analyzed 1834 publications about COVID?19 and cerebrovascular disease from the Scopus database considering the time since the beginning of the pandemic between 2019 and 2020. Bibliometric indicators were evaluated such as number of citations, citations per publication by authors, countries, journals, and collaborations at national, international, institutional, and impact levels according to Cite Score Quartile and h?index metrics. All analysis was performed using SciVal software. Results: The highest percentage of articles corresponded to universities in the United States, including Harvard and New York with 59 and 20 publications, respectively, and the University of Toronto in Canada with 22 publications. In relation to citation indicators, journals such as Stroke and Journal Stroke and Cerebrovascular diseases obtained 1971 and 561 citations, respectively. Regarding collaboration indicators, the national collaboration index was 39.4% and the institutional collaboration index was 31.1%. Finally, neurology, cardiovascular medicine, and cardiology and surgery were the subject areas with the highest research results, with 424, 217, and 128 studies, respectively. Conclusion: It was observed that the United States was the country with the highest scientific production on COVID?19 and cerebrovascular disease in the year 2020 in the different health areas; however, more research is still needed worldwide for a better analysis of the bibliometric indicators on the subject.

Producción científica de la Revista Cubana de Informática Médica desde el año 2017 hasta el 2021

Introducción: La Bibliometría como ciencia, permite el análisis detallado de las publicaciones, se hace cada vez más necesaria, y en el campo investigativo ha creado tendencia. Objetivo: Describir la producción científica de la Revista Cubana de Informática Médica en el periodo desde 2017 hasta 2021. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal mediante el análisis bibliométrico de la Revista Cubana de Informática Médica desde 2017 hasta 2021. El universo lo conformaron 131 artículos publicados en el periodo de estudio. Se estudiaron las tipologías de artículos, la cantidad de artículos por años y de autores, así como el país de procedencia. Para el cálculo de la obsolescencia de las referencias se empleó el índice de Price. Resultados: El año 2021 presentó el mayor número de publicaciones en el periodo de estudio para un 25,19 %, los artículos originales representaron el 68,70 % del total. La cantidad de autores por artículos que predominó fue 3, lo que representa el 25,95 %. Se destacan los artículos de Cuba con el 90,08% del total. Los manuscritos de revisión mostraron el mayor índice de Price con 0.96 y los originales el menor con un 0.66. Conclusiones: La Revista Cubana de Informática Médica ha mantenido un crecimiento en las publicaciones, destacándose en el año 2021 el incremento de artículos originales, predominaron las publicaciones con 3 autores, Cuba es el país que más aportó. Las revisiones mostraron mayor nivel de actualidad de las referencias bibliográficas que los originales.

Introduction: Bibliometrics as a science allows the detailed analysis of publications, becoming more and more necessary and creating a trend in the research field. Objective: To describe the scientific production of the Cuban Journal of Medical Informatics in the period from 2017 to 2021. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study by conducting the bibliometric analysis of the Cuban Journal of Medical Informatics from 2017 to 2021. The universe consisted of 131 articles published in this study period. The typologies of articles, the number of articles and authors per years, and the country of origin were revealed in the study. Price index was the indicator used to calculate the obsolescence of references. Results: The year 2021 presented the highest number of publications in the aforementioned study period (25.19%); original articles accounted for 68.70% of the total. The predominant number of authors per articles was 3, representing 25.5%. Cuban articles stood out with 90.08% of the total of articles. Review manuscripts showed the highest Price index (0.96) while original articles revealed the lowest one (0.66). Conclusions: The Cuban Journal of Medical Informatics has maintained a growth in publications, standing out an increase in original articles in 2021 and predominating those publications with 3 authors. The reviews showed higher level of currentness of bibliographic references than original works.

Tooth Bleaching: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited papers

Abstract This study analyzes the characteristics of the top 100 most-cited papers related to tooth bleaching. A literature search was performed on the Web of Science up to March 2022. The number of citations was cross-matched with the citation count on Scopus and Google Scholar. The following data were collected: number and density of citations; authorship; year and journal of publication; study design and thematic; keywords; institution and country of origin. Spearman's correlation and Poisson regression were used to determine associations between the number of citations and study characteristics. The VOSviewer software was used to generate collaborative network maps for the authors and keywords. The number of citations ranged from 66 to 450. Papers were published between 1981 and 2020. The most frequent study design and topic were laboratory-based studies and 'interaction of the bleaching agent with dental tissues', respectively. Cochran M, Loguercio AD, Matis B, Reis A, and Suliman M were the authors with the highest number of papers. The countries with the most papers were the United States of America (USA) (28%) and Brazil (20%). Indiana University and State University of Ponta Grossa were the institutions with the most papers (6% each). There was a very strong correlation among the number of citations of the three databases. The 100 most-cited papers related to tooth bleaching were mainly published by the USA and Brazil, with laboratory-based studies addressing topics related to the effects of bleaching agents on tooth structure being the most prevalent.

Resumo Este estudo analisa as características dos 100 artigos mais citados relacionados ao clareamento dental. Uma pesquisa bibliográfica foi realizada na Web of Science até março de 2022. O número de citações foi cruzado com a contagem de citações na Scopus e na Google Scholar. Foram coletados os seguintes dados: número e densidade de citações; autoria; ano e periódico de publicação; desenho do estudo e temática; palavras-chave; instituição e país de origem. A correlação de Spearman e a regressão de Poisson foram usadas para determinar associações entre o número de citações e as características do estudo. O software VOSviewer foi utilizado para gerar mapas de rede colaborativa para os autores e palavras-chave. O número de citações variou de 66 a 450. Os artigos foram publicados entre 1981 e 2020. O desenho e o tópico de estudo mais frequentes foram estudos laboratoriais e interação do agente clareador com tecidos dentários, respectivamente. Cochran M, Loguercio AD, Matis B, Reis A e Suliman M foram os autores com maior número de artigos. Os países com mais artigos foram os Estados Unidos da América (EUA) (28%) e o Brasil (20%). A Universidade de Indiana e a Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa foram as instituições com mais artigos (6% cada). Houve uma correlação muito forte entre o número de citações das três bases de dados. Os 100 artigos mais citados relacionados ao clareamento dentário foram publicados principalmente pelos EUA e Brasil, sendo os estudos laboratoriais que abordaram tópicos relacionados aos efeitos dos agentes clareadores na estrutura dentária os mais prevalentes.

Revisión bibliométrica de la producción científica de salud bucal en América Latina y el Caribe durante la pandemia deCOVID-19 / Bibliometric review of the scientific production of oral health in Latin America and The Caribbean during COVID-19pandemic

Introducción: El análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica en salud permite detallar el interés de autores, instituciones, organizaciones y revistas que coadyuvaron a un mejor entendimiento de la historia natural del SARS-CoV-2, con relación a la salud bucal. Objetivo: Caracterizar la bibliometría de la producción científica en salud bucal, relacionada con la pandemia de la COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe. Métodos: Se analizaron 143 artículos de la base de datos Scopus, publicados durante los años 2020 y 2021. Se consideró la producción científica anual, los diez autores e instituciones y organizaciones con mayor actividad en publicación, las diez principales revistas involucradas en publicaciones de artículos del tema, así como los términos bibliométricos más citados. Resultados: En el año 2020 se publicaron 73 artículos sobre el tema, que disminuyeron en 5,47 por ciento para el año 2021. Las instituciones más involucradas en publicaciones pertenecieron a Estados Unidos, Perú y Brasil. El autor más activo fue Machado R.A. La revista Investigación Brasileña en Odontopediatría y Clínica Integrada fue la más citada con 8,47 por ciento, el artículo más citado fue "Impactos del coronavirus COVID-19 en la Odontología y el potencial salival" con 119 citas y los descriptores más utilizados fueron "los humanos", "pandemia" y "odontología". Conclusión: La mayor producción científica de artículos citados, autores con más número de citaciones y revistas de gran publicación en salud bucal de América Latina y el Caribe está en Brasil. En EE.UU. se encuentra la institución con mayor actividad de apoyo para la publicación de artículos científicos y los descriptores más utilizados "pandemia", "humano" y "enfermedad coronavirus 2019"(AU)

Introduction: The bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in health allows detailing the interest of authors, institutions, organizations and journals that contributed to a better understanding of the natural history of SARS-CoV-2, in relation to oral health. Objective: To characterize the bibliometrics of scientific production in oral health, related to COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: One hundred forty-three articles were analyzed from Scopus database, which were published in 2020 and 2021. This study considered the annual scientific production, the ten authors, institutions and organizations with the greatest publication activity, the ten main journals involved in article publications on the subject, as well as the most cited bibliometric terms. Results: In 2020, seventy three articles on the subject were published, which decreased by 5.47 percent for 2021. The institutions most involved in publications were from the United States, Peru, and Brazil. The most active author was Machado R.A. The journal Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada was the most cited with 8.47 percent, the most cited article was "Impacts of coronavirus COVID-19 on Dentistry and salivary potential" with 119 citations and the most used descriptors were "the humans", "pandemic" and "dentistry". Conclusion: The largest scientific production of cited articles, authors with the highest number of citations, and highly-published journals on oral health in Latin America and the Caribbean is in Brazil. The institution with the greatest support activity for the publication of scientific articles and the most used descriptors "pandemic", "human" and "2019 coronavirus disease" are in the United States(AU)

Producción científica sobre traumatismo craneoencefálico en revistas estudiantiles cubanas. Enero de 2015-junio de 2021

Introducción: los traumatismos craneoencefálicos son un reto para los servicios de salud. Recibir desde pregrado una formación en su atención constituye una necesidad. Objetivo: caracterizar la producción científica sobre traumatismo craneoencefálico, publicada en revistas estudiantiles cubanas entre enero de 2015 y junio de 2021. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio bibliométrico, descriptivo y retrospectivo. El universo estuvo constituido por nueve artículos, de los que se analizó tipología, año de publicación, cantidad de autores, provincia y centro de procedencia de los mismos, cantidad de referencias, cantidad de artículos por revista y número de veces citados. Resultados: el 77,8 % de los artículos fueron originales, y 2020 fue el año más productivo (55,6 %). El 44,4 % de los artículos fue firmado por cinco autores; el 32,4 % de los autores pertenecían a la provincia de Pinar del Río. La media de referencias por artículos fue de 19,9; el Índice de Price se encontró entre 0,45 y 0,82, con una media de 0,75. El 55,6 % de las publicaciones aparecieron en la revista Universidad Médica Pinareña, cuyos artículos también fueron los más citados (85 %). Conclusiones: la producción científica estudiantil sobre trauma craneoencefálico es baja, y la influencia y visibilidad de los artículos disponibles, atendiendo a la cantidad de citas, es pequeña.

Introduction: crania-encephalic traumas are a challenge for health services. Receiving training on their care since undergraduate studies is a necessity. Objective: to characterize the scientific production on crania-encephalic trauma published in Cuban student journals between January 2015 and June 2021. Materials and methods: a bibliometric, descriptive and retrospective study was carried out. The universe was constituted by 9 articles, of which typology, year of publication, quantity of authors, province and centers of origin, quantity of references; quantity of articles per journal and number of times cited were analyzed. Results: 77.8% of the articles were originals, and 2020 was the most productive year (55.6%). 44% of the articles were signed by five authors; 32.4% of the authors belonged to the province of Pinar del Rio. The average number of references per articles was 19.9; the Price Index was found between 0.45 and 0.85, with an average of 0.75. 55.6% of the publications appeared in the journal Universidad Médica Pinareña, the articles of which were also the most cited ones (85%). Conclusions: the student scientific production on crania-encephalic trauma is low, and the influence and visibility of the available articles, taking into account the quantity of cites, is small.

Participação em saúde nas Américas: mapeamento bibliométrico da produção, impacto, visibilidade e colaboração / Participation in health in the Americas: Bibliometric mapping of production, impact, visibility and collaboration / Participación en salud em las Américas: mapeo bibliométrico de producción, impacto, isibilidade y colaboración

Resumo A participação em saúde tem gerado um grande número de publicações em todo o mundo. Para conhecer as especificidades dessa produção nas Américas, foi realizada uma análise bibliométrica de artigos em inglês, espanhol e português. Foram realizadas buscas na BVS, PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS e SciELO, consolidando uma base de dados com 641 referências. Com auxílio do software VOSviewer, analisamos padrões de citação, coautoria e a distribuição cronológica por países e idiomas. Foi possível verificar o crescimento da produção, a relevância quantitativa e o impacto dos diferentes países. A análise indicou que os EUA concentram o maior número de citações, e o Brasil, apesar de ser o primeiro em número de publicações, é o terceiro em número de citações. O mesmo ocorre com os periódicos brasileiros que, com o maior número de artigos, caem no ranking dos mais citados. Nos dez artigos mais citados, descatam-se trabalhos desenvolvidos nos EUA e Canadá. A análise de coautoria indicou que a Universidade de Toronto, a Fiocruz e a Universidade de Harvard são as que mais têm colaborações formais com outras organizações. Concluímos que existem desigualdades de impacto, visibilidade e internacionalização neste campo, indicando obstáculos para o desenvolvimento científico e das políticas de saúde.

Abstract Participation in health has generated a large number of publications around the world. In order to know the specificities of this production in the Americas, a bibliometric analysis of articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese was carried out. Searches were carried out in the VHL, PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS and SciELO, consolidating a database with 641 references. With the help of the VOSviewer software, we analyzed citation patterns, co-authorship and the chronological distribution by countries and languages. It was possible to verify the growth of production, the quantitative relevance and the impact of the different countries. The analysis indicated that the USA concentrates the largest number of citations and Brazil, despite being the first in number of publications, is the third in number of citations. The same occurs with Brazilian journals that, with the largest number of articles, fall in the ranking of the most cited. The co-authorship analysis indicated that the University of Toronto, Fiocruz and Harvard University have the most formal collaborations with other organizations. We conclude that there are inequalities of impact, visibility and internationalization in this field, indicating obstacles to scientific development and health policies.

Resumen La participación en salud ha generado una gran cantidad de publicaciones alrededor del mundo. Para conocer las especificidades de esta producción en las Américas, se realizó un análisis bibliométrico de artículos en inglés, español y portugués. Se realizaron búsquedas en la BVS, Pubmed, SCOPUS, WOS y SciELO, consolidando una base de datos con 641 referencias. Con la ayuda del software VOSviewer, analizamos los patrones de citación, la coautoría y la distribución cronológica por países e idiomas. Se pudo verificar el crecimiento de la producción, la relevancia cuantitativa y el impacto de los diferentes países. El análisis indicó que EE.UU. concentra el mayor número de citas y Brasil, a pesar de ser el primero en número de publicaciones, es el tercero en número de citas. En los diez artículos más citados se descartan trabajos desarrollados en EE.UU. y Canadá. El análisis de coautoría indicó que la Universidad de Toronto, Fiocruz y la Universidad de Harvard tienen las colaboraciones más formales con otras organizaciones. Concluimos que existen desigualdades de impacto, visibilidad e internacionalización en este campo, indicando obstáculos para el desarrollo científico y las políticas de salud.

Publication and citation analyses of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020 / 中国血吸虫病防治杂志

Objective To investigate the publications and citations of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, so as to provide insights into improving the journal quality and impact.. Methods All publications were retrieved from 60 issues of 10 volumes of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, and publication and citation analyses were performed using a bibliometric method. Results A total of 1 867 articles were published in Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020, with the largest number in 2012 (220 publications) and the lowest in 2020 (135 publications), and original article (36.48%), control experience (17.14%) and control study (10.34%) were the three most common article type. The overall proportion of grant-supported articles was 59.08% (1 103/1 867), and the number of grant per article was (2.34±1.58) grants. The mean duration from submission to publication was (173.48±105.84) days per article, and there was a significant difference in the mean duration from submission to publication among years (F = 30.883, P < 0.01). Jiangsu Province (492 publications, 26.35%), Shanghai Municipality (264 publications, 14.14%) and Hubei Province (230 publications, 12.32%) were the three most productive provinces where the first author lived, and disease control and prevention institutions were the predominant affiliations of the first author (67.22%), with Jiangsu Institute of Schistosomiasis Control, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and Wannan Medical College as the three most productive affiliations. The number of authors was 5.94 authors per publication, and the proportion of co-authored publications was 95.45% in Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control from 2011 to 2020. Journal article was the predominant type of cited (89.97%), and the mean number of citations was (15.70±11.56) citations per publication, with a significant difference in the mean number of citations per publication among years (F = 2.205, P < 0.05). The impact factors of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control ranged from 0.877 to 1.676 during the period from 2011 to 2020, and the overall Price index was 47.59%. Conclusions Both the academic impact and national transmissibility of Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control appeared a tendency towards a rise from 2011 to 2020. Seeking high-quality contributions, increasing interdisciplinary integration, shortening the duration from submission to publication, expanding the coverage of publication services and enhancing impact are the future priorities of the journal.

Acupuncture-Neuroimaging Research Trends over Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis / 中国结合医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To identify topics attracting growing research attention as well as frontier trends of acupuncture-neuroimaging research over the past two decades.@*METHODS@#This paper reviewed data in the published literature on acupuncture neuroimaging from 2000 to 2020, which was retrieved from the Web of Science database. CiteSpace was used to analyze the publication years, countries, institutions, authors, keywords, co-citation of authors, journals, and references.@*RESULTS@#A total of 981 publications were included in the final review. The number of publications has increased in the recent 20 years accompanied by some fluctuations. Notably, the most productive country was China, while Harvard University ranked first among institutions in this field. The most productive author was Tian J with the highest number of articles (50), whereas the most co-cited author was Hui KKS (325). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (92) was the most prolific journal, while Neuroimage was the most co-cited journal (538). An article written by Hui KKS (2005) exhibited the highest co-citation number (112). The keywords "acupuncture" (475) and "electroacupuncture" (0.10) had the highest frequency and centrality, respectively. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) ranked first with the highest citation burst (6.76).@*CONCLUSION@#The most active research topics in the field of acupuncture-neuroimaging over the past two decades included research type, acupoint specificity, neuroimaging methods, brain regions, acupuncture modality, acupoint specificity, diseases and symptoms treated, and research type. Whilst research frontier topics were "nerve regeneration", "functional connectivity", "neural regeneration", "brain network", "fMRI" and "manual acupuncture".

Visual analysis of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs in China by bibliometric analysis / 药学实践杂志

Objective To analyze the research status and predict the development trend of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs in China, and to provide reference for clinical comprehensive evaluation. Methods CNKI, Wanfang and VIP database were used to search the published articles of clinical comprehensive evaluation. Literature searching was set from the building time of the database to 2022, the basic information about the published articles was obtained for the evaluation of the literature quality. Bibliometrics and CiteSpace 6.1.R3 software were used to visualize the research authors, research institutions, and key words. Results After data screening, a total of 126 Chinese published articles were selected. The analysis showed that the numbers of published articles were rising continuously, and China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Xie Yanming were the institute and the author with the maximum number of literatures, respectively. Conclusion The clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs was conducted based on the clinical value of drugs, guided by the policy requirements. It is suggested that researchers should conduct the comprehensive evaluation according to the focus and requirements of government agencies, the pharmaceutical industry and the clinical applications.

Estudio bibliométrico sobre las publicaciones científicas estudiantiles en la revista Progaleno

Introducción: La publicación estudiantil es esencial en la educación de los futuros galenos. Cuba cuenta con revistas científicas médicas que permiten la difusión de las investigaciones de los estudiantes del área de la salud. Objetivo: Caracterizar las publicaciones científicas estudiantiles en la revista Progaleno del año 2018 al 2022. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio bibliométrico y descriptivo de las publicaciones científicas estudiantiles en la revista Progaleno. El universo estuvo constituido por 97 artículos, no se aplicaron técnicas de muestreo. Variables analizadas: tipo de artículo según sección, cantidad de autores por artículo, año de publicación y procedencia de los autores. Se elaboraron gráficos y tablas para representar los datos y se concluyó con un análisis cuantitativo. Se estudiaron indicadores bibliométricos. Resultados: El 43,29 % de los artículos fueron artículos originales, seguido de los artículos de revisión (27,83 %); los artículos con tres autores predominaron en las publicaciones estudiadas (32 %); el año 2021 fue el de mayor publicación (24,74 %) y la provincia Camagüey la de mayor representación según la procedencia de autores (63,38 %). El grado de colaboración fue de 0,84 y el índice de productividad fue de 1,97. Conclusiones: El predominio de artículos originales, la participación de tres autores, el año 2021 como el año de más publicaciones y el auge de autores de la provincia Camagüey caracterizan la producción científica de la revista Progaleno.

Introduction: The student publication is essential in the education of future doctors. Cuba has medical scientific journals that allow the dissemination of research by students in the area of health. Objective: To characterize the student scientific publications in the Progaleno magazine from 2018 to 2022. Methods: A bibliometric and descriptive study of student scientific publications in the Progaleno magazine was carried out. The universe consisted of 97 articles, sampling techniques were not applied. Analyzed variables: type of article according to section, number of authors per article, year of publication and origin of the authors. Graphs and tables were prepared to represent the data and concluded with a quantitative analysis. Bibliometric indicators were studied. Results: 43.29% of the articles were original articles, followed by review articles (27.83%); articles with 3 authors predominated in the publications studied (32%); the year 2021 was the one with the highest publication (24.74%) and the province of Camagüey the one with the highest representation according to the origin of the authors (63.38%). The degree of collaboration was 0.84 and the productivity index was 1.97. Conclusions: The predominance of original articles, the participation of 3 authors, the year 2021 as the year with the most publications and the rise of authors from the province of Camagüey characterize the scientific production of the Progaleno journal.

Análisis bibliométrico de los 100 artículos más citados publicados en español de Latinoamérica y el Caribe sobre COVID-19

El objetivo del estudio fue identificar los 100 artículos más citados sobre COVID-19 procedentes de Latinoamérica y el Caribe, publicados en español. Los registros se obtuvieron de la Web of Science. Se examinó: número de citas, autoría, cobertura geográfica, colaboración, revista y categorías temáticas. Los 100 artículos se publicaron en 41 revistas. La revista más citada fue Salud Pública de México (10 artículos; 75 citas). México fue el máximo exponente (28 artículos; 201 citas). Los autores más citados fueron: C. Alpuche-Aranda y E. Lazcano-Ponce, afiliados a la institución más citada, el Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública de México (n= 7). La principal categoría de la Web of Science fue Medicine, General & Internal (36 artículos; 173 citas). Epidemiología fue el tema más trabajado. No hubo correlación entre la colaboración internacional y el mayor número de citas (r= 0,15, p= 0,1). El estudio puede ayudar a reconocer la visibilidad de las investigaciones más citadas.

The aim of the study was to identify the 100 most cited articles on COVID-19 from Latin America and the Caribbean, published in Spanish. The records were obtained from the Web of Science. The following were examined: number of citations, authorship, geographic coverage, collaboration, journal and thematic categories. The 100 articles were published in 41 journals. The most cited journal was Salud Pública de México (10 articles; 75 citations). Mexico was the top performer (28 articles; 201 citations). The most cited authors were: C. Alpuche-Aranda and E. Lazcano-Ponce, affiliated with the most cited institution, the National Institute of Public Health of Mexico (n= 7). The main Web of Science category was Medicine, General & Internal (36 articles; 173 citations). Epidemiology was the most worked topic. There was no correlation between international collaboration and the highest number of citations (r= 0.15, p= 0.1). The study may help to recognize the visibility of the most cited research.

Estado de las investigaciones sobre la gestión de los procesos en revistas científicas

Las particularidades de las revistas científicas en la actualidad, en cuanto a procesos, resultados y sujetos actuantes que garantizan su materialización y sostenimiento, hacen de estas un objeto de estudio de innegable complejidad desde el punto de vista organizacional; todo lo cual revela la ineludible necesidad de una adecuada gestión. Sin embargo, esta perspectiva no es muy común en la literatura científica especializada, lo que implica una búsqueda detallada de las aportaciones realizadas hasta el momento. Los objetivos del estudio se orientaron a analizar, desde el punto de vista bibliométrico, la gestión de los procesos en las revistas científicas, con la finalidad de contribuir a revelar las tendencias que han caracterizado su tratamiento en la comunidad científica y con ello sentar las bases para posteriores estudios. Se realizó un análisis sobre la gestión de los procesos en revistas científicas, utilizando la estrategia de búsqueda "título"-"resumen"-"palabras clave" hasta el año 2022, en las bases de datos Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar y SciELO. Se emplearon como métodos teóricos el análisis y síntesis, el hermenéutico-dialéctico y el holístico-dialéctico; como métodos empíricos la revisión documental y el análisis bibliométrico. Se evaluaron y contrastaron diferentes indicadores bibliométricos: la productividad de artículos, productividad y colaboración autoral, ocurrencias, co-ocurrencias de palabras clave, entre otros. Se pudo determinar que, si bien el tema de la gestión de los procesos en revistas científicas ha suscitado un creciente interés en la comunidad científica internacional, ha sido poco tratado en la literatura general y desde la perspectiva de la gestión organizacional.

The particularities of scientific journals today, in terms of processes, results and acting subjects that guarantee their materialization and sustainability make them an object of study of undeniable complexity from the organizational point of view, all of which reveals the unavoidable need to proper management. However, this perspective is not very common in specialized scientific literature, which implies a detailed search of the contributions made up to now. The objectives of the study were oriented to analyze, from the bibliometric point of view, the management of processes in scientific journals, in order to help reveal the trends that have characterized their treatment in the scientific community and thereby lay the foundations for further studies. An analysis was carried out on the management of processes in scientific journals, using the search strategy "title"-"abstract"-"key words" until 2022, in Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and SciELO databases. Analysis and synthesis, hermeneutic-dialectical and holistic-dialectical methods were used as theoretical methods; as empirical methods, documentary review and bibliometric analysis. Different bibliometric indicators were evaluated and contrasted: article productivity, authorial productivity and collaboration, occurrences, co-occurrences of keywords, among others. It was possible to determine that, although the issue of process management in scientific journals has aroused growing interest in the international scientific community, it has been little discussed in general literature and from the perspective of organizational management.

Publicaciones científicas sobre anestesiología y reanimación en las revistas médicas seriadas de Villa Clara / Scientific Articles on Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Published in Serial Medical Journals from Villa Clara Province

Introducción: La publicación en revistas científicas es una habilidad comunicativa que permite a los profesionales validar los resultados derivados de las investigaciones en todas las áreas del conocimiento. Objetivo: Realizar un análisis bibliométrico de los artículos publicados sobre anestesiología y reanimación en las revistas científicas de la provincia de Villa Clara. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal, retrospectivo de las publicaciones sobre anestesiología y reanimación en las revistas Acta Médica del Centro, Medicentro Electrónica, EDUMECENTRO y CorSalud desde sus inicios hasta julio de 2022. Se realizó un análisis documental clásico para la búsqueda y recuperación de información Se obtuvo un total de 84 registros en formato digital. Las variables analizadas fueron: productividad por año, productividad por autor, distribución de Lotka, tipo de autoría, productividad por género, productividad por revista, productividad por institución, palabras clave y tipo de artículo. Resultados: Existe un predominio de los artículos originales, las autorías múltiples y los pequeños productores, 23 instituciones aportaron contribuciones. Conclusiones: Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico de los artículos publicados, la producción científica sobre anestesiología y reanimación en las cuatro revistas villaclareñas fue escasa. Los profesionales afiliados al Hospital Provincial Clínico-Quirúrgico "Arnaldo Milián Castroˮ aportaron el mayor número de contribuciones(AU)

Introduction: Publication in scientific journals is a communicative skill that allows professionals to validate the results derived from research in all areas of knowledge. Objective: To carry out a bibliometric analysis of the articles published on Anesthesiology and Resuscitation in the scientific journals of the Villa Clara province. Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective study of the publications on Anesthesiology and Resuscitation in the journals Acta Médica del Centro, Medicentro Electronica, EDUMECENTRO and CorSalud was carried out from its beginnings until July 2022. A classic documentary analysis was carried out for the information search and retrieval A total of 84 records were obtained in digital format. The variables analyzed were: productivity per year, productivity per author, Lotka distribution, type of authorship, productivity per genre, productivity per journal, productivity per institution, keywords and type of article. Results: there is a predominance of original articles, multiple authors and small producers, 23 institutions contributed. Conclusions: The scientific production on Anesthesiology and Resuscitation in the four Villa Clara is scarce. Professionals affiliated with the Arnaldo Milian Castro Provincial Clinical-Surgical Hospital made the largest number of contributions. The production of scientific documents on this specialty in the EDUMECENTRO journal should be encouraged, and authors should make optimal use of health science descriptors. The bibliometric indicators behaved in accordance with what is shown by the majority of the scientific production(AU)

Transparência, accountability e governance: revisão sistemática da literatura nos hospitais públicos / Transparencia, rendición de cuentas y gobernanza: una revisión de la literatura en el contexto de los hospitales públicos / Transparency, accountability, and governance: a literature review in the context of public hospitals

Resumo Neste estudo busca-se desenvolver uma revisão da literatura baseada na análise bibliométrica sobre o tema da transparência e da accountability no contexto da governance dos hospitais públicos, procurando identificar linhas de investigação, teoria, método de investigação e lacunas existentes por intermédio da análise das publicações científicas datadas até 2020. A investigação seguiu o referencial teórico da transparência e da accountability no setor público com o intuito de compreender o seu enquadramento no contexto da governance dos hospitais. Com recurso ao software Bibliometrix e terminado o processo de consulta dos artigos nas bases de dados Scopus e WoS, foram selecionados 118 artigos para este estudo. Constatou-se que, no período entre 2017-2020, cerca de 85% das publicações são de base qualitativa e há uma tendência crescente no estudo da transparência e da accountability na governança dos hospitais públicos. A transparência surge frequentemente interligada à responsabilização dos agentes (accountability), às políticas de comunicação externa (relatórios públicos) e interna, assim como à sua compreensibilidade. Verificou-se a ainda predominância das publicações de origem norte-americana e chinesa. O estudo identifica também a escassez de investigação baseada em modelos quantitativos que explorem relações de dependência entre as dimensões estudadas, limitando a compreensão da interdependência entre as práticas de transparência e os atributos internos e externos das organizações. O estudo contribui para o conhecimento sobre interações entre transparência, accountability e prestação de contas na governança dos hospitais públicos.

Resumen El objetivo de este estudio es desarrollar una revisión bibliográfica basada en el análisis bibliométrico sobre el tema de la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas en el ámbito de la gobernanza de los hospitales públicos, buscando identificar líneas de investigación, teorías, métodos de investigación y lagunas existentes a través del análisis de las publicaciones científicas fechadas hasta 2020. La investigación siguió el referencial teórico de la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas en el sector público para comprender su marco en el ámbito de la gobernanza de los hospitales. Recurriendo al software Bibliometrix, y tras el proceso de consulta de los artículos en las bases de datos Scopus y WoS, se seleccionaron 118 artículos de interés para este estudio. Se constató que, en el periodo comprendido entre 2017 y 2020, aproximadamente el 85% de las publicaciones son de base cualitativa y existe una tendencia creciente en el estudio de la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas en el ámbito de la gobernanza de los hospitales públicos. La transparencia aparece a menudo interconectada con la responsabilidad de los agentes (rendición de cuentas), las políticas de comunicación externa (informes públicos) e interna, así como su comprensibilidad. También se observó el predominio de publicaciones de origen norteamericano y chino. El estudio también identifica la escasez de investigaciones que utilicen modelos cuantitativos que exploren las relaciones de dependencia entre las dimensiones estudiadas, lo que limita la comprensión de la interdependencia entre las prácticas de transparencia y los atributos internos y externos de las organizaciones. El estudio contribuye al conocimiento de las interacciones entre transparencia, rendición de cuentas y reporte en el ámbito de la gobernanza de los hospitales públicos.

Abstract This study develops a literature review based on bibliometric analysis on the theme of transparency and accountability within the scope of governance of public hospitals, seeking to identify research lines, theories, research methods, and existing gaps through the analysis of scientific publications until 2020. The investigation followed the theoretical lens of transparency and accountability in the public sector to understand its framework within the scope of the governance of hospitals. Using the Bibliometrix software, and after the consultation process of the articles published in the Scopus and WoS databases, a sample with 118 articles was selected. It was found that, in the period between 2017-2020, approximately 85% of the publications were qualitative, and there is a growing trend in the study of transparency and accountability within the scope of governance of public hospitals. Transparency often appears interconnected with the accountability of agents (accountability), external communication policies (public reports), internal communication policies, and their comprehensibility. The predominance of publications of North American and Chinese origin was also noted. The study also identifies the scarcity of research using quantitative models that explore dependency relationships between the dimensions studied, limiting the comprehensibility of the interdependence between transparency practices and organizations' internal and external attributes. The study contributes to the knowledge about the interactions between transparency, accountability, and reporting within the scope of governance of public hospitals.

Bibliometric Evaluation of the Available Research on Coronavirus (COVID-19)

Bibliometric research provides a quantitative basis for evaluating the productivity and impact of researchers, research groups, institutions, and even countries. Therefore, this study examined a bibliometric analysis of the available research on Coronavirus. We explored the Web of Science, WoS, and database for publications about COVID-19 beginning January 2000 up until December 2021. Only relevant observational and interventional studies on coronavirus covering the study period were included in the study. Data covering publications on coronavirus research from 2000 to 2021 were extracted from the ISI Web of Science on January17, 2022.A total of 96,766 research publications were found. Nine objectives were developed to guide the study. There were many research publications in the year 2021, followed by 2020. The most funding agencies for coronavirus have been the United States Department of Health Human Services, National Institute of Health NIH, USA, national Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC, NIH National Institute of Allergy Infection Diseases NIAID, National Key Research and Development Program of China, European Union EU. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and PLOS ONE are the leading research outlet on coronavirus in the world as the duo has collectively published 2,196 in the area of coronavirus. The study concluded that the USA, the Peoples' Republic of China, Italy, England, and India are the leading countries that have contributed to research in coronavirus(AU)

La investigación bibliométrica proporciona una base cuantitativa para evaluar la productividad y el impacto de investigadores, grupos de investigación, instituciones e, incluso, países. Por lo tanto, este estudio examinó un análisis bibliométrico de la investigación disponible sobre el coronavirus. Exploramos la Web of Science, WoS y la base de datos en busca de publicaciones sobre COVID-19 desde enero de 2000 hasta diciembre de 2021. Se incluyeron en el estudio estudios observacionales e intervencionistas relevantes sobre el coronavirus que cubrían el período de estudio. Los datos de las publicaciones sobre la investigación del coronavirus de 2000 a 2021 se extrajeron del ISI Web of Science el 17 de enero de 2022. Se encontró un total de 96,766 publicaciones. Se desarrollaron nueve objetivos para guiar el estudio. El año de mayor cantidad de publicaciones fue el 2021, seguido del 2020. Las agencias que más fondos han financiado para el coronavirus han sido el Departamento de Servicios Humanos de Salud de los Estados Unidos, el Instituto Nacional de Salud NIH, EE.UU., la Fundación Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de China NSFC, el Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas Alérgicas de los NIH, el NIAID, el Programa Nacional Clave de Investigación y Desarrollo de China y la Unión Europea UE. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health y PLOS ONE son los principales medios de investigación sobre el coronavirus en el mundo, ya que el dúo ha publicado colectivamente 2196 en esta temática. El estudio concluyó que Estados Unidos, la República Popular China, Italia, Inglaterra e India son los principales países que han contribuido a la investigación en coronavirus(AU)